The world of commerce is greatly benefiting from new technologies and digital transformation opportunities. The solutions to sell online have never been so numerous and migrating one’s activity online is now simple and accessible to all businesses. While the obsession with omnichannel sales is opening up all sales channels, it is also accelerating online sales capabilities.
This evolution, which is beneficial for all brands, manufacturers and retailers (B2C and B2B alike), nevertheless hides risks. One such risk is that of the so-called channel conflict (also known as “channel cannibalization”), which is increasingly observed. Channel conflict, if poorly managed, can become a serious downside of the capabilities offered by an omnichannel approach.
Below, we’ll deep-dive into the notion of channel conflict and into channel conflict management strategies.
Channel conflict occurs when two or more sales channels and/or partners disagree. Traditionally, companies have four main channels at their disposal to sell to their customers. They can address consumers directly via an ecommerce site (i.e. their own or even a third-party online marketplace) or via a physical store, or establish a partnership with physical or online distributors.
When the decisions and actions of one partner affect the business objectives of another, channel conflict arises. There are three types of channel conflict: vertical conflict, horizontal conflict and multi-channel conflict. We shall analyze them one by one.
The causes of channel conflicts are multiple. They can be the result of different objectives between the manufacturer and its partners, conflicting market visions, obsolete attribution models, dissociated marketing approaches such as a promotional campaign conducted differently on several channels. When the potential customer base is small, but the manufacturer allows multiple distributors, their motivation may be affected.
Given the numerous sources of channel conflict, the risk presented to the customer is that their experience is fragmented. In the age of the connected and demanding customer, it is essential that the considerations and issues of each channel are invisible to them — shoppers do not care about what goes on behind the scenes, but they do care about convenience, prices and perks. Overall, the shopping experience and interaction with the business must be seamlessly unified across all customer touch points and channels.
Now that we’ve covered the origins and typology of this phenomenon, which allows us to correctly identify it, it’s time to analyze some proactive or reactive measures to it. Here are five strategies useful in channel conflict management, all centered on partner relationships.
For the last 15 years, the traditional commerce scheme has been based on strategies and platforms dedicated to each channel, each trying to address the end-customer in its own distinct and separate way. Today, an open approach is predominant. Each partner must be considered as an inherent part of the strategy with its own value. Additionally, each partner must be able to communicate freely with the brand to address the customer in the most coherent way possible.
New global approaches are emerging, in contrast to the model that consisted until now of intertwining technological layers. In these new approaches, technology plays the role of facilitator and enables the creation of a single buying journey, across multiple channels, that meets the expectations of the shopper, be it an individual in B2C settings or a business in B2B environments.
Above all, these integrate seamlessly into the ecosystem of each stakeholder in the supply chain (i.e. manufacturer, distributor or brand). Their common denominator is their ability to independently activate the complete management of each sales channel by integrating ecommerce, OMS (Order Management System) and marketplace tools into a single solution. This is how any form of channel conflict can be quickly identified and reconciled.